Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Into the Enchanted Chamber
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Timeless Miracle. (non-admin closure) Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talkabout my edits? 11:48, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Into the Enchanted Chamber (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Disputed prod with the assertion that it is popular. No reliable sources to pass WP:GNG. Mattg82 (talk) 16:14, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:02, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Unless this album was named something different in Swedish and there's coverage under that name, I'm not seeing anything reliable to show that this passes notability guidelines at this time. I also couldn't bring up the website listed that was supposed to show how the album was popular, so that site's reliability is unknown at this time.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 09:51, 18 December 2011 (UTC)tokyogirl79[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 05:07, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Arbitrarily0 (talk) 18:09, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete- I see no coverage in reliable sources. -- Whpq (talk) 17:36, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]- Redirect - a redirect makes some sense. -- Whpq (talk) 23:16, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to the band article as a plausible search term.--Michig (talk) 16:32, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.